PTI chief’s conviction, disqualification remains intact: legal experts

PTI chairman Imran Khan addressing a crowd at a public rally. — Twitter/Imran Khan

The suspension of former high minister Imran Khan’s sentence through the Islamabad High Court (IHC) within the Toshakhana case does no longer undo his disqualification and conviction, which can stay intact till the courtroom laws at the primary attraction difficult the trial courtroom’s verdict, legal experts stated Tuesday.

Earlier this month, a district and periods courtroom within the federal capital had sentenced Khan to a few years in jail and imposed a superb of Rs100,000, after discovering him accountable of corrupt practices associated with the state reward repository — in a transfer that barred him from contesting elections due later this yr.

The IHC on Monday suspended the PTI chief’s sentence within the Toshakhana case and ordered the government to unlock him on bail.

However, the courtroom stated it could factor an in depth verdict later during which in would point out causes for the suspension of the trial’s verdict that sentenced Khan to a few years in jail.

Commenting at the IHC’s brief verdict, recommend Hafiz Ahsan Ahmed advised Geo News that the decision isn’t ordinary or remarkable as there have been shiny possibilities of suspension as Khan’s sentence is of 3 years.

However, the attorney added that PTI’s leader conviction and disqualification would stay intact.

“The verdict of suspension of sentence is never on the merit of the case,” Ahmed defined. “One of the grounds of the suspension might be the delay in the fixing of the main appeal in the high court for the hearing, whereas another ground is that punishment being less than five years. In this case, it was three years.”

Concurring with recommend Ahmed’s view, Lawyer Raja Kahlid stated that IHC’s verdict was once no longer ordinary.

“It was a short sentence which means the punishment was of three years. They (PTI) filed a petition under Section-426 of Code of Criminal Procedure for the suspension of the sentence.

“In the main appeal, the prayer is made for setting aside the conviction of the accused. However, in the appeal filed according to CrPc, the court was implored to suspend the sentence for the time being,” Kahlid stated.

He defined that suspension of sentence was once no longer ordinary in the ones circumstances that have 3 years of punishment. 

Moreover, the legal skilled additional stated one more reason for the suspension of the sentence is that the principle attraction may no longer be mounted early and the courtroom may take greater than six months to come to a decision because of the backlog of circumstances.

However, the conviction and disqualification will stay in impact, he added.

Leave a Comment